Export limit exceeded: 11005 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11005 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-115299 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Contact Form By Supsystic | 2026-10-30 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1 does not verify a CSRF nonce before saving its mail settings, allowing an attacker to overwrite the site's outbound mail configuration, including the SMTP server, its credentials and the notification recipient, by tricking a logged-in administrator into visiting a crafted page, which can route the Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1's contact-form notifications through infrastructure the attacker controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115300 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Contact Form By Supsystic | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1 does not validate a CSRF token or request origin on two administrator-only actions that bulk-delete captured form submissions and wipe a form's statistics, allowing attackers to permanently destroy a site's stored contact leads and analytics by tricking a logged-in administrator into sending a forged request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107262 | 1 Drupal | 1 Advanced Filesystem | 2026-10-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Advanced Filesystem allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced Filesystem versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.28. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118570 | 1 Drupal | 1 Fasttoggle | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Fasttoggle allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Fasttoggle versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118558 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Stripe | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Stripe allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Commerce Stripe versions: from 2.0.0 to 2.2.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114541 | 1 Drupal | 1 Frontend Editing | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Frontend Editing allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Frontend Editing versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.9.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61826 | 1 Morpheus65535 | 1 Bazarr | 2026-10-30 | 10 Critical |
| Bazarr is a companion application to Sonarr and Radarr. Prior to 1.5.7-beta.14, the `api_ns_plex` namespace in `bazarr/api/plex/oauth.py` omits `@authenticate` on its Resource handlers, while normal APIs require an API key and no global authentication hook compensates. Anonymous callers can invoke `POST /api/plex/oauth/logout` to clear credentials and disable the integration, or `POST /api/plex/apikey` to persist an attacker-selected key, without a PIN, account or state precondition. `POST /api/plex/oauth/pin` and `GET /api/plex/oauth/pin/<pin_id>/check` additionally allow an attacker who completes a PIN with an attacker-controlled Plex account to bind that account's token to the instance. `PlexPinCheck` skips state validation when `state_param` is absent and merely logs a mismatch without stopping execution. `POST /api/plex/select-server`, `POST /api/plex/oauth/servers`, `POST /api/plex/webhook/create`, `POST /api/plex/webhook/delete` and `POST /api/plex/encrypt-apikey` expose further `write_config()` operations. Attacker-controlled server URLs feed later outbound requests carrying the configured API key in `X-Plex-Token`, enabling server-side request forgery and credential exposure in addition to persistent configuration tampering and integration denial of service. Version 1.5.7-beta.14 closes the anonymous API-mutation path by adding authentication; complete OAuth state validation is not established and remains a separate residual for curator review. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110983 | 2 Wordpress-extensions, Wppa | 2 Wp Photo Album Plus, Wp Photo Album Plus | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Photo Album Plus WordPress plugin before 9.3.04.004 does not verify the origin or a security token for one of its comment-management requests, allowing attackers to delete photo comments by tricking a logged-in user who holds comment-moderation rights into loading a crafted page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39734 | 2 Saad Iqbal, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wp Easypay, Wp Easypay | 2026-10-30 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Path Traversal in WP EasyPay <= 4.5.4 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27062 | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPFunnels Team WPFunnels wpfunnels allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WPFunnels: from n/a through 3.13.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6017 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management through versions 2.10, before 2.10.7, 2.11, before 2.11.4, and 2.12, before 2.12.4. This vulnerability allows an unprivileged user to view confidential managed cluster credentials through the UI. This information should only be accessible to authorized users and may result in the loss of confidentiality of administrative information, which could be leaked to unauthorized actors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65566 | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Meow Apps AI Engine ai-engine allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AI Engine: from n/a through 3.8.8. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4139 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite, Network Satellite Server and 1 more | 2026-10-30 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Spacewalk Java site packages. This cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. This can lead to unauthorized actions, including disabling user accounts, adding new user accounts, or escalating privileges by modifying existing user accounts to have administrator access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63913 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-30 | 8.2 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check An unintended behavior in the TCP conntrack state machine allows a connection to be forced into the CLOSE state using an RST packet with an invalid sequence number. Specifically, after a SYN packet is observed, an RST with an invalid SEQ can transition the conntrack entry to TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE, regardless of whether the RST corresponds to the expected reply direction. The relevant code path assumes the RST is a response to an outgoing SYN, but does not validate packet direction or ensure that a matching SYN was actually sent in the opposite direction. As a result, a crafted packet sequence consisting of a SYN followed by an invalid-sequence RST can prematurely terminate an active NAT entry. This makes connection teardown easier than intended. So, tighten the state transition logic to ensure that RST-triggered CLOSE transitions only occur when the RST is a valid response to a previously observed SYN in the correct direction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119466 | 2026-10-30 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPExperts APIExperts Square for WooCommerce woosquare allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects APIExperts Square for WooCommerce: from n/a through 4.7.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61671 | 1 Labredescefetrj | 1 Wegia | 2026-10-30 | 8.1 High |
| WeGIA is a web manager for charitable institutions. Prior to the advisory's stated patched version 3.8.7, the `/controle/control.php` dispatch endpoint accepts attacker-controlled `nomeClasse`, `metodo`, and record identifier parameters through `extract($_REQUEST)`, including id, `idatendido`, `idInterno`, and `id_funcionario`, while the affected Controle CRUD methods do not verify record ownership. Any authenticated user can view, modify, or delete another user's records, exposing CPF, RG, addresses, medical records, financial data, and employee records. `AtendidoControle` lacks ownership checks on alterar, excluir, `listarUm`, `alterarInfPessoal`, `alterarDocumentacao`, `alterarImagem`, `alterarEndereco`, and `alterarStatus`; `InternoControle` lacks them on incluir, alterar, excluir, `listarUm`, `listarTodos`, and `listarCpf`. `FuncionarioControle` lacks ownership checks on `alterarInfPessoal`, `alterarEndereco`, `alterarDocumentacao`, `alterarImagem`, `alterarCargaHoraria`, and excluir; `VoluntarioControle` lacks them on `alterarInfPessoal`, `alterarEndereco`, `alterarDetalhes`, `alterarImagem`, and excluir. `AtendidoControle` and `InternoControle` additionally lack CSRF validation, allowing a malicious page visited by an authenticated victim to perform state-changing operations using the victim's session. `FuncionarioControle` and `VoluntarioControle` have per-method CSRF checks, but those checks do not prevent the object-authorization bypass. The advisory identifies version 3.8.7 as patched. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119426 | 1 Phpmyadmin | 1 Phpmyadmin | 2026-10-30 | 7.5 High |
| phpMyAdmin through 5.2.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL by bypassing CSRF token checks on non-AJAX POST requests. Attackers can lure authenticated victims into submitting cross-site POSTs carrying sql_query to /sql or /database/sql, running SQL with the victim's database privileges under http or config authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45141 | 1 Chamilo | 1 Chamilo Lms | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Chamilo LMS is an open-source learning management system. Prior to 2.0.1, the `add`, `delete_gradebook_from_skill`, `save_profile`, and `delete_profile` actions in `public/main/inc/ajax/skill.ajax.php` perform database mutations without `Security::check_token()` validation. An attacker can use cross-site request forgery to cause an authenticated administrator or DRH who visits a malicious page to create, modify, or delete skill records and profiles, or remove skill-gradebook associations. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76297 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-30 | 4.2 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, an unauthenticated user could trick a user that holds a role with the edit_federated_providers capability into turning off all federated search providers. Successful exploitation could temporarily prevent federated searches from retrieving data from remote datasets. The vulnerability is possible because the federated provider Representational State Transfer (REST) API accepts GET requests for actions that change provider state. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see Run federated searches over remote Splunk platform deployments (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/federated-search/10.6/run-federated-searches-across-other-splunk-deployments/run-federated-searches-over-remote-splunk-platform-deployments) and Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.4/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119407 | 2 Element, Element-hq | 2 Element, Element-web | 2026-10-30 | 7.1 High |
| Element Web and Element Desktop before 1.12.32 accept guest credentials from URL fragment parameters in loadSession, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to log out users and clear local stores. Attackers can lure logged-in users into opening links with guest_user_id and guest_access_token to force an attacker-controlled guest session and destroy unbacked end-to-end encryption keys. | ||||