Export limit exceeded: 12632 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12632 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-27845 | 1 Espec | 1 North America Web Controller | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| In ESPEC North America Web Controller 3 before 3.3.4, /api/v4/auth/ with any invalid authentication request results in exposing a JWT secret. This allows for elevated permissions to the UI. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27827 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micontact Center Business | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| A vulnerability in the legacy chat component of Mitel MiContact Center Business through 10.2.0.3 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct an information disclosure attack due to improper handling of session data. A successful exploit requires user interaction and could allow an attacker to access sensitive information, leading to unauthorized access to active chat rooms, reading chat data, and sending messages during an active chat session. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45733 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 2.8 Low |
| Hardware logic contains race conditions in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable partial information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47818 | 1 Lws | 1 Lws Hide Login | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in LWS LWS Hide Login allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects LWS Hide Login: from n/a through 2.1.8. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52237 | 1 Siemens | 80 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I800nc, Ruggedcom I801 and 77 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i800NC, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i801NC, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i802NC, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM i803NC, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100NC, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200NC, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RP110NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600FNC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS1600TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400NC, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS401NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000HNC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000NC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS8000TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS910NC, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RS969NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. The web server of the affected devices allow a low privileged user to access hashes and password salts of all system's users, including admin users. An attacker could use the obtained information to brute force the passwords offline. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52238 | 1 Siemens | 2 Ruggedcom Rst2228, Ruggedcom Rst2228p | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.9.0). The web server of the affected systems leaks the MACSEC key in clear text to a logged in user. An attacker with the credentials of a low privileged user could retrieve the MACSEC key and access (decrypt) the ethernet frames sent by authorized recipients. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25370 | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium | ||
| An issue in realme GT 2 (RMX3311) running Android 14 with realme UI 5.0 allows a physically proximate attacker to obtain sensitive information via the show app only setting function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25195 | 1 Zulip | 1 Zulip | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Zulip is an open source team chat application. A weekly cron job (added in 50256f48314250978f521ef439cafa704e056539) demotes channels to being "inactive" after they have not received traffic for 180 days. However, upon doing so, an event was sent to all users in the organization, not just users in the channel. This event contained the name of the private channel. Similarly, the same commit (50256f48314250978f521ef439cafa704e056539) added functionality to notify clients when channels stopped being "inactive." The first message sent to a private channel which had not previously had any messages for over 180 days (and were thus already marked "inactive") would leak an event to all users in the organization; this event also contained the name of the private channel. Commits 75be449d456d29fef27e9d1828bafa30174284b4 and a2a1a7f8d152296c8966f1380872c0ac69e5c87e fixed the issue. This vulnerability only existed in `main`, and was not part of any published versions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7046 | 2 Gowebsmarty, Wordpress | 2 Wp-encryption, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| The WP Encryption – One Click Free SSL Certificate & SSL / HTTPS Redirect to Force HTTPS, SSL Score plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 7.0 via exposed Private key files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including TLS Certificate Private Keys | ||||
| CVE-2024-22435 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Web ViewPoint Enterprise software. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow unauthorized users to access some resources on a NonStop system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46388 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor | ||||
| CVE-2024-11994 | 1 Elastic | 1 Apm Server | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| APM server logs could contain parts of the document body from a partially failed bulk index request. Depending on the nature of the document, this could disclose sensitive information in APM Server error logs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15065 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data, Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties vulnerability in Kings Information & Network Co. KESS Enterprise on Windows allows Privilege Escalation, Modify Existing Service, Modify Shared File.This issue affects KESS Enterprise: before *.25.9.19.exe | ||||
| CVE-2025-15033 | 1 Automattic | 1 Woocommerce | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in WooCommerce 8.1 to 10.4.2 can allow logged-in customers to access order data of guest customers on sites with a certain configuration. This has been fixed in WooCommerce 10.4.3, as well as all the previously affected versions through point releases, starting from 8.1, where it has been fixed in 8.1.3. It does not affect WooCommerce 8.0 or earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12637 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Moving Users plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.05 via the export functionality. The JSON files are stored in predictable locations with guessable file names when exporting user data. This could allow unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive user data, for instance, email addresses, hashed passwords, and IP addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14197 | 1 Verysync | 1 Verysync | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Verysync 微力同步 up to 2.21.3. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /rest/f/api/resources/f96956469e7be39d of the component Web Administration Module. Such manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32007 | 1 Secomea | 1 Gatemanager | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| This issue affects: Secomea GateManager Version 9.5 and all prior versions. Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in web server of Secomea GateManager to potentially leak information to remote servers. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12149 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Search Guard FLX versions 3.1.2 and earlier, while Document-Level Security (DLS) is correctly enforced elsewhere, when the search is triggered from a Signals watch, the DLS rule is not enforced, allowing access to all documents in the queried indices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12148 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Search Guard versions 3.1.1 and earlier, Field Masking (FM) rules are improperly enforced on fields of type IP (IP Address). While the content of these fields is properly redacted in the _source document returned by search operations, the results do return documents (hits) when searching based on a specific IP values. This allows to reconstruct the original contents of the field. Workaround - If you cannot upgrade immediately, you can avoid the problem by using field level security (FLS) protection on fields of the affected types instead of field masking. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12147 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Search Guard FLX versions 3.1.1 and earlier, Field-Level Security (FLS) rules are improperly enforced on object-valued fields. When an FLS exclusion rule (e.g., ~field) is applied to a field which contains an object as its value, the object is correctly removed from the _source returned by search operations. However, the object members (i.e., child attributes) remain accessible to search queries. This exposure allows adversaries to infer or reconstruct the original contents of the excluded object. Workaround - If you cannot upgrade immediately and FLS exclusion rules are used for object valued attributes (like ~object), add an additional exclusion rule for the members of the object (like ~object.*). | ||||