| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Buffer overflow in Novell GroupWise 6.0.1 Support Pack 1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long RCPT TO command. |
| rwcgi60 CGI program in Oracle Reports Server, by design, provides sensitive information such as the full pathname, which could enable remote attackers to use the information in additional attacks. |
| Buffer overflow in read_smtp_response of protocol.c in libesmtp before 0.8.11 allows a remote SMTP server to (1) execute arbitrary code via a certain response or (2) cause a denial of service via long server responses. |
| Netscape 6.2.3 and earlier, and Mozilla 1.0.1, allow remote attackers to corrupt heap memory and execute arbitrary code via a GIF image with a zero width. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 3.6(Rel) and earlier, and 2.x.x, when configured to use internal authentication with group accounts and without any user accounts, allows remote VPN clients to log in using PPTP or IPSEC user authentication. |
| HTML interface for Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.x.x and 3.x.x before 3.0.3(B) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a long URL request. |
| Information leaks in Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.x.x and 3.x.x before 3.5.4 allow remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via the (1) SSH banner, (2) FTP banner, or (3) an incorrect HTTP request. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator before 2.5.2(F), with encryption enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reload) via a Windows-based PPTP client with the "No Encryption" option set. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, and 3.x before 3.5.1, allows restricted administrators to obtain user passwords that are stored in plaintext in HTML source code. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, and 3.x before 3.5.2, allows restricted administrators to obtain certificate passwords that are stored in plaintext in the HTML source code for Certificate Management pages. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, and 3.x before 3.5.3, adds an "HTTPS on Public Inbound (XML-Auto)(forward/in)" rule but sets the protocol to "ANY" when the XML filter configuration is enabled, which ultimately allows arbitrary traffic to pass through the concentrator. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, and 3.x before 3.5.3, allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information without authentication by directly accessing certain HTML pages. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, and 3.x before 3.5.3, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long (1) username or (2) password to the HTML login interface. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, 3.6(Rel), and 3.x before 3.5.5, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long user name. |
| The LAN-to-LAN IPSEC capability for Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, and 3.x before 3.5.4, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via an incoming LAN-to-LAN connection with an existing security association with another device on the remote network, which causes the concentrator to remove the previous connection. |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, 3.6(Rel), and 3.x before 3.5.5, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via (1) malformed or (2) large ISAKMP packets. |
| Cisco Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client software 2.x.x and 3.x before 3.0.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via TCP packets with source and destination ports of 137 (NETBIOS). |
| Cisco Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client software 2.x.x, and 3.x before 3.5.1C, allows local users to use a utility program to obtain the group password. |
| Cisco Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client software 2.x.x, and 3.x before 3.5.1C, does not properly verify that certificate DN fields match those of the certificate from the VPN Concentrator, which allows remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks. |
| Cisco Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client software 2.x.x, and 3.x before 3.5.2B, does not generate sufficiently random numbers, which may make it vulnerable to certain attacks such as spoofing. |