Export limit exceeded: 419215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (54276 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-41234 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: * The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset). * The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input. * The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input. * The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details). An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: * The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header. * The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via one of: * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String), or * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, ASCII) * The filename is not derived from user-supplied input. * The filename is derived from user-supplied input but sanitized by the application. * The attacker cannot inject malicious content in the downloaded content of the response. Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.7 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.20 * 6.0.5 - 6.0.28 * Older, unsupported versions are not affected MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.8OSS6.1.x6.1.21OSS6.0.x6.0.29 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. CWE-113 in `Content-Disposition` handling in VMware Spring Framework versions 6.0.5 to 6.2.7 allows remote attackers to launch Reflected File Download (RFD) attacks via unsanitized user input in `ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset)` with non-ASCII charsets. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41100 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect authentication vulnerability in ParkingDoor. Through this vulnerability it is possible to operate the device without the access being logged in the application and even if the access permissions have been revoked. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4057 | 1 Redhat | 2 Amq Broker, Rhosemc | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in ActiveMQ Artemis. The password generated by activemq-artemis-operator does not regenerate between separated CR dependencies. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40246 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: fix out of bounds memory read error in symlink repair xfs/286 produced this report on my test fleet: ================================================================== BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds read in memcpy_orig+0x54/0x110 Out-of-bounds read at 0xffff88843fe9e038 (184B right of kfence-#184): memcpy_orig+0x54/0x110 xrep_symlink_salvage_inline+0xb3/0xf0 [xfs] xrep_symlink_salvage+0x100/0x110 [xfs] xrep_symlink+0x2e/0x80 [xfs] xrep_attempt+0x61/0x1f0 [xfs] xfs_scrub_metadata+0x34f/0x5c0 [xfs] xfs_ioc_scrubv_metadata+0x387/0x560 [xfs] xfs_file_ioctl+0xe23/0x10e0 [xfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x76/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x1e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 kfence-#184: 0xffff88843fe9df80-0xffff88843fe9dfea, size=107, cache=kmalloc-128 allocated by task 3470 on cpu 1 at 263329.131592s (192823.508886s ago): xfs_init_local_fork+0x79/0xe0 [xfs] xfs_iformat_local+0xa4/0x170 [xfs] xfs_iformat_data_fork+0x148/0x180 [xfs] xfs_inode_from_disk+0x2cd/0x480 [xfs] xfs_iget+0x450/0xd60 [xfs] xfs_bulkstat_one_int+0x6b/0x510 [xfs] xfs_bulkstat_iwalk+0x1e/0x30 [xfs] xfs_iwalk_ag_recs+0xdf/0x150 [xfs] xfs_iwalk_run_callbacks+0xb9/0x190 [xfs] xfs_iwalk_ag+0x1dc/0x2f0 [xfs] xfs_iwalk_args.constprop.0+0x6a/0x120 [xfs] xfs_iwalk+0xa4/0xd0 [xfs] xfs_bulkstat+0xfa/0x170 [xfs] xfs_ioc_fsbulkstat.isra.0+0x13a/0x230 [xfs] xfs_file_ioctl+0xbf2/0x10e0 [xfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x76/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x1e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1300113 Comm: xfs_scrub Not tainted 6.18.0-rc4-djwx #rc4 PREEMPT(lazy) 3d744dd94e92690f00a04398d2bd8631dcef1954 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-4.module+el8.8.0+21164+ed375313 04/01/2014 ================================================================== On further analysis, I realized that the second parameter to min() is not correct. xfs_ifork::if_bytes is the size of the xfs_ifork::if_data buffer. if_bytes can be smaller than the data fork size because: (a) the forkoff code tries to keep the data area as large as possible (b) for symbolic links, if_bytes is the ondisk file size + 1 (c) forkoff is always a multiple of 8. Case in point: for a single-byte symlink target, forkoff will be 8 but the buffer will only be 2 bytes long. In other words, the logic here is wrong and we walk off the end of the incore buffer. Fix that. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54015 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) V9.8x (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions >= V9.50 < V9.90). Affected devices do not properly validate SNMP GET requests. This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information of the affected devices with SNMPv2 GET requests using default credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54090 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE PXC Series (BACnet) (All versions), APOGEE PXC Series (P2 Ethernet) (All versions), TALON TC Series (BACnet) (All versions). Affected devices contain an out-of-bounds read in the memory dump function. This could allow an attacker with Medium (MED) or higher privileges to cause the device to enter an insecure cold start state. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56083 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Cognition Devin before 2024-12-12 provides write access to code by an attacker who discovers the https://vscode-randomly_generated_string.devinapps.com URL (aka the VSCode live share URL) for a specific "Use Devin's Machine" session. For example, this URL may be discovered if a customer posts a screenshot of a Devin session to social media, or publicly streams their Devin session. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56139 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| pdftools is a high level tools to convert PDF files to ePUB formats. In versions up to and including 0.5.0 maliciously crafted epub files can cause a stack overflow leading to a crash. This issue has not yet been addressed and users are advised to avoid untrusted input to their systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36853 | 1 Microsoft | 1 .net | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability (CVE-2025-21172) exists in msdia140.dll due to integer overflow and heap-based overflow. Per CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow, a heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc(). Per CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound, is when a product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number. NOTE: This CVE affects only End Of Life (EOL) software components. The vendor, Microsoft, has indicated there will be no future updates nor support provided upon inquiry. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36755 | 1 Cleverdisplay | 1 Blueone | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The CleverDisplay BlueOne hardware player is designed with its USB interfaces physically enclosed and inaccessible under normal operating conditions. Researchers demonstrated that, after cicumventing the device’s protective enclosure, it was possible to connect a USB keyboard and press ESC during boot to access the BIOS setup interface. BIOS settings could be viewed but not modified. This behavior slightly increases the attack surface by exposing internal system information (CWE-1244) once the enclosure is removed, but does not allow integrity or availability compromise under standard or tested configurations. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36730 | 1 Windsurf | 1 Windsurf | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A prompt injection vulnerability exists in Windsurft version 1.10.7 in Write mode using SWE-1 model. It is possible to create a file name that will be appended to the user prompt causing Windsurf to follow its instructions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36625 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Nessus versions prior to 10.8.4, a non-authenticated attacker could alter Nessus logging entries by manipulating http requests to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36553 | 2 Broadcom, Dell | 2 Bcm5820x, Controlvault3 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the CvManager functionality of Dell ControlVault3 prior to 5.15.14.19 and Dell ControlVault3 Plus prior to 6.2.36.47. A specially crafted ControlVault API call can lead to memory corruption. An attacker can issue an api call to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56826 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 5.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the OpenJPEG project. A heap buffer overflow condition may be triggered when certain options are specified while using the opj_decompress utility. This can lead to an application crash or other undefined behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56827 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 5.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the OpenJPEG project. A heap buffer overflow condition may be triggered when certain options are specified while using the opj_decompress utility. This can lead to an application crash or other undefined behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56908 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| In Perfex Crm < 3.2.1, an authenticated attacker can send a crafted HTTP POST request to the affected upload_sales_file endpoint. By providing malicious input in the rel_id parameter, combined with improper input validation, the attacker can bypass restrictions and upload arbitrary files to directories of their choice, potentially leading to remote code execution or server compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3648 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in the Now Platform that could result in data being inferred without authorization. Under certain conditional access control list (ACL) configurations, this vulnerability could enable unauthenticated and authenticated users to use range query requests to infer instance data that is not intended to be accessible to them. To assist customers in enhancing access controls, ServiceNow has introduced additional access control frameworks in Xanadu and Yokohama, such as Query ACLs, Security Data Filters and Deny-Unless ACLs. Additionally, in May 2025, ServiceNow delivered to customers a security update that is designed to enhance customer ACL configurations. Customers, please review the KB Articles in the References section. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3497 | 2026-04-15 | 8.7 High | ||
| The Linux distribution underlying the Radiflow iSAP Smart Collector (CentOS 7 - VSAP 1.20) is obsolete and reached end of life (EOL) on June 30, 2024. Thus, any unmitigated vulnerability could be exploited to affect this product. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57063 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A prototype pollution in the lib function of php-date-formatter v1.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted payload. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57064 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A prototype pollution in the lib.setValue function of @syncfusion/ej2-spreadsheet v27.2.2 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted payload. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because they found that the lib.setValue function is not utilized. | ||||