Export limit exceeded: 419215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (29953 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-2104 | 1 K-opticom Corporation | 1 Business Lala Call | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Business LaLa Call App for Android 1.4.7 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2105 | 1 Presentcast Inc | 1 Tver | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The TVer App for Android 3.2.7 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2109 | 1 Cybozu | 1 Kunai | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cybozu KUNAI for Android 3.0.4 to 3.0.5.1 allow remote attackers to obtain log information through a malicious Android application. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3067 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager Forms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Adobe Experience Manager Forms versions 6.2, 6.1, 6.0 have an information disclosure vulnerability resulting from abuse of the pre-population service in AEM Forms. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2947 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Adobe Acrobat Reader versions 15.020.20042 and earlier, 15.006.30244 and earlier, 11.0.18 and earlier have a security bypass vulnerability when manipulating Form Data Format (FDF). | ||||
| CVE-2017-2989 | 1 Adobe | 1 Campaign | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Adobe Campaign versions Build 8770 and earlier have an input validation bypass that could be exploited to read, write, or delete data from the Campaign database. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3043 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Adobe Acrobat Reader versions 11.0.19 and earlier, 15.006.30280 and earlier, 15.023.20070 and earlier have a memory address leak vulnerability in the collaboration functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3844 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Collaboration Assurance | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in exporting functions of the user interface for Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view file directory listings and download files. Affected Products: Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance software versions 11.0, 11.1, and 11.5 are vulnerable. Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance software versions prior to 11.0 are not vulnerable. More Information: CSCvc86238. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(0). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3552 | 1 Oracle | 1 Hospitality Opera 5 Property Services | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Hospitality OPERA 5 Property Services component of Oracle Hospitality Applications (subcomponent: OPERA Room Image/Picture Setup). Supported versions that are affected are 5.4.0.x, 5.4.1.x, 5.4.2.x, 5.4.3.x, 5.5.0.x and 5.5.1.x. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hospitality OPERA 5 Property Services. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Hospitality OPERA 5 Property Services accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3560 | 1 Oracle | 1 Hospitality Opera 5 Property Services | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Hospitality OPERA 5 Property Services component of Oracle Hospitality Applications (subcomponent: OXI Interface). Supported versions that are affected are 5.4.0.x, 5.4.1.x, 5.4.2.x, 5.4.3.x, 5.5.0.x and 5.5.1.x. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hospitality OPERA 5 Property Services. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Hospitality OPERA 5 Property Services accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3898 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Livesafe | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A man-in-the-middle attack vulnerability in the non-certificate-based authentication mechanism in McAfee LiveSafe (MLS) versions prior to 16.0.3 allows network attackers to modify the Windows registry value associated with the McAfee update via the HTTP backend-response. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3743 | 1 Lenovo | 3 Advanced Settings Utility, Toolscenter Dynamic System Analysis, Updatexpress System Pack Installer | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| If multiple users are concurrently logged into a single system where one user is sending a command via the Lenovo ToolsCenter Advanced Settings Utility (ASU), UpdateXpress System Pack Installer (UXSPI) or Dynamic System Analysis (DSA) to a second machine, the other users may be able to see the user ID and clear text password that were used to access the second machine during the time the command is processing. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3732 | 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat | 5 Node.js, Openssl, Jboss Core Services and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3733 | 2 Hp, Openssl | 2 Operations Agent, Openssl | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| During a renegotiation handshake if the Encrypt-Then-Mac extension is negotiated where it was not in the original handshake (or vice-versa) then this can cause OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0e to crash (dependent on ciphersuite). Both clients and servers are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3736 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 5 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0g. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. This only affects processors that support the BMI1, BMI2 and ADX extensions like Intel Broadwell (5th generation) and later or AMD Ryzen. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3764 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Xclarity Administrator | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability was identified in Lenovo XClarity Administrator (LXCA) before 1.4.0 where LXCA user account names may be exposed to unauthenticated users with access to the LXCA web user interface. No password information of the user accounts is exposed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3738 | 4 Debian, Nodejs, Openssl and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Node.js, Openssl and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3742 | 3 Google, Lenovo, Microsoft | 3 Android, Connect2, Windows | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Lenovo Connect2 versions earlier than 4.2.5.4885 for Windows and 4.2.5.3071 for Android, when an ad-hoc connection is made between two systems for the purpose of sharing files, the password for this ad-hoc connection will be stored in a user-readable location. An attacker with read access to the user's contents could connect to the Connect2 hotspot and see the contents of files while they are being transferred between the two systems. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3752 | 2 Ibm, Lenovo | 30 1\, 1g L2-7 Slb, Bladecenter and 27 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An industry-wide vulnerability has been identified in the implementation of the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol used on some Lenovo switches. Exploitation of these implementation flaws may result in attackers being able to erase or alter the routing tables of one or many routers, switches, or other devices that support OSPF within a routing domain. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3759 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Lenovo Service Framework Android application accepts some responses from the server without proper validation. This exposes the application to man-in-the-middle attacks leading to possible remote code execution. | ||||