Export limit exceeded: 26181 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11656 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-12863 | 2 Debian, Opencv | 2 Debian Linux, Opencv | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| In opencv/modules/imgcodecs/src/grfmt_pxm.cpp, function PxMDecoder::readData has an integer overflow when calculate src_pitch. If the image is from remote, may lead to remote code execution or denial of service. This affects Opencv 3.3 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12864 | 2 Debian, Opencv | 2 Debian Linux, Opencv | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| In opencv/modules/imgcodecs/src/grfmt_pxm.cpp, function ReadNumber did not checkout the input length, which lead to integer overflow. If the image is from remote, may lead to remote code execution or denial of service. This affects Opencv 3.3 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14024 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Wonderware Indusoft Web Studio, Wonderware Intouch | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Stack-based Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio v8.0 SP2 Patch 1 and prior versions, and InTouch Machine Edition v8.0 SP2 Patch 1 and prior versions. The stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified, which may allow remote code execution with high privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14585 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Hipchat Data Center, Hipchat Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability could lead to remote code execution for authenticated administrators. This issue was introduced in version 2.2.0 of Hipchat Server and version 3.0.0 of Hipchat Data Center. Versions of Hipchat Server starting with 2.2.0 and before 2.2.6 are affected by this vulnerability. Versions of Hipchat Data Center starting with 3.0.0 and before 3.1.0 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14586 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Hipchat | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Hipchat for Mac desktop client is vulnerable to client-side remote code execution via video call link parsing. Hipchat for Mac desktop clients at or above version 4.0 and before version 4.30 are affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15311 | 1 Huawei | 8 Mate 10, Mate 10 Firmware, Mate 10 Pro and 5 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The baseband modules of Mate 10, Mate 10 Pro, Mate 9, Mate 9 Pro Huawei smart phones with software before ALP-AL00 8.0.0.120(SP2C00), before BLA-AL00 8.0.0.120(SP2C00), before MHA-AL00B 8.0.0.334(C00), and before LON-AL00B 8.0.0.334(C00) have a stack overflow vulnerability due to the lack of parameter validation. An attacker could send malicious packets to the smart phones within radio range by special wireless device, which leads stack overflow when the baseband module handles these packets. The attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform a denial of service attack or remote code execution in baseband module. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16717 | 1 We-con | 1 Levi Studio Hmi | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Heap-based Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in WECON LeviStudio HMI. The heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified, which may allow remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16908 | 1 Horde | 1 Groupware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Horde Groupware 5.2.19, there is XSS via the Name field during creation of a new Resource. This can be leveraged for remote code execution after compromising an administrator account, because the CVE-2015-7984 CSRF protection mechanism can then be bypassed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2781 | 1 Matrixssl | 1 Matrixssl | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| An exploitable heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the X509 certificate parsing functionality of InsideSecure MatrixSSL 3.8.7b. A specially crafted x509 certificate can cause a buffer overflow on the heap resulting in remote code execution. To trigger this vulnerability, a specially crafted x509 certificate must be presented to the vulnerable client or server application when initiating secure connection. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2785 | 1 Pharos | 1 Popup | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An exploitable buffer overflow exists in the psnotifyd application of the Pharos PopUp printer client version 9.0. A specially crafted packet can be sent to the victim's computer and can lead to a heap based buffer overflow resulting in remote code execution. This client is always listening, has root privileges, and requires no user interaction to exploit. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2787 | 1 Pharos | 1 Popup | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A buffer overflows exists in the psnotifyd application of the Pharos PopUp printer client version 9.0. A specially crafted packet can be sent to the victim's computer and can lead to a heap based buffer overflow resulting in potential remote code execution. This client is always listening, has root privileges, and requires no user interaction to exploit. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2921 | 1 Cesanta | 1 Mongoose | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in the Websocket protocol implementation of Cesanta Mongoose 6.8. A specially crafted websocket packet can cause an integer overflow, leading to a heap buffer overflow and resulting in denial of service and potential remote code execution. An attacker needs to send a specially crafted websocket packet over network to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2922 | 1 Cesanta | 1 Mongoose | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in the Websocket protocol implementation of Cesanta Mongoose 6.8. A specially crafted websocket packet can cause a buffer to be allocated while leaving stale pointers which leads to a use-after-free vulnerability which can be exploited to achieve remote code execution. An attacker needs to send a specially crafted websocket packet over the network to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3758 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Improper access controls on several Android components in the Lenovo Service Framework application can be exploited to enable remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3759 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Lenovo Service Framework Android application accepts some responses from the server without proper validation. This exposes the application to man-in-the-middle attacks leading to possible remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3760 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Lenovo Service Framework Android application uses a set of nonsecure credentials when performing integrity verification of downloaded applications and/or data. This exposes the application to man-in-the-middle attacks leading to possible remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3761 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Service Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Lenovo Service Framework Android application executes some system commands without proper sanitization of external input. In certain cases, this could lead to command injection which, in turn, could lead to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4997 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Vasa Provider Virtual Appliance | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| EMC VASA Provider Virtual Appliance versions 8.3.x and prior has an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability that could potentially be exploited by malicious users to compromise the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6325 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway can encounter a file inclusion vulnerability, which is a type of vulnerability that is most commonly found to affect web applications that rely on a scripting run time. This issue is caused when an application builds a path to executable code using an attacker-controlled variable in a way that allows the attacker to control which file is executed at run time. This file inclusion vulnerability subverts how an application loads code for execution. Successful exploitation of a file inclusion vulnerability will result in remote code execution on the web server that runs the affected web application. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6326 | 1 Symantec | 1 Messaging Gateway | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway can encounter an issue of remote code execution, which describes a situation whereby an individual may obtain the ability to execute commands remotely on a target machine or in a target process. | ||||