Export limit exceeded: 419215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12632 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5146 | 1 Carlosgavazzi | 4 Vmu-c Em, Vmu-c Em Firmware, Vmu-c Pv and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Carlo Gavazzi VMU-C EM prior to firmware Version A11_U05, and VMU-C PV prior to firmware Version A17. Sensitive information is stored in clear-text. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5117 | 5 Debian, Google, Linux and 2 more | 5 Debian Linux, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Use of an uninitialized value in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 61.0.3163.79 for Linux and Windows allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5096 | 2 Google, Redhat | 3 Android, Chrome, Rhel Extras | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Insufficient policy enforcement during navigation between different schemes in Google Chrome prior to 60.0.3112.78 for Android allowed a remote attacker to perform cross origin content download via a crafted HTML page, related to intents. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5082 | 2 Google, Redhat | 3 Android, Chrome, Rhel Extras | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Failure to take advantage of available mitigations in credit card autofill in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.92 for Android allowed a local attacker to take screen shots of credit card information via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5075 | 5 Apple, Google, Linux and 2 more | 9 Macos, Android, Chrome and 6 more | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in CSP reporting in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, allowed a remote attacker to obtain the value of url fragments via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5017 | 2 Google, Redhat | 2 Chrome, Rhel Extras | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Interactions with the OS in Google Chrome prior to 56.0.2924.76 for Mac insufficiently cleared video memory, which allowed a remote attacker to possibly extract image fragments on systems with GeForce 8600M graphics chips via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5011 | 2 Google, Redhat | 2 Chrome, Rhel Extras | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Google Chrome prior to 56.0.2924.76 for Windows insufficiently sanitized DevTools URLs, which allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to read filesystem contents via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5001 | 1 Emc | 1 Rsa Archer Egrc | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| EMC RSA Archer 5.4.1.3, 5.5.3.1, 5.5.2.3, 5.5.2, 5.5.1.3.1, 5.5.1.1 is affected by an information exposure through an error message vulnerability. A remote low privileged attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to use information disclosed in an error message to launch another more focused attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5000 | 1 Emc | 1 Rsa Archer Egrc | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| EMC RSA Archer 5.4.1.3, 5.5.3.1, 5.5.2.3, 5.5.2, 5.5.1.3.1, 5.5.1.1 is affected by an information exposure through an error message vulnerability. A remote low privileged attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to use information disclosed in an error message to launch another more focused attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4999 | 1 Emc | 1 Rsa Archer Egrc | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| EMC RSA Archer 5.4.1.3, 5.5.3.1, 5.5.2.3, 5.5.2, 5.5.1.3.1, 5.5.1.1 is affected by an authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Discussion Forum Messages. A remote low privileged attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to elevate their privileges and view other users' discussion forum messages. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4986 | 1 Emc | 1 Secure Remote Services | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| EMC ESRS VE 3.18 or earlier contains Authentication Bypass that could potentially be exploited by malicious users to compromise the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4977 | 1 Emc | 1 Rsa Archer Security Operations Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| EMC RSA Archer Security Operations Management with RSA Unified Collector Framework versions prior to 1.3.1.52 contain a sensitive information disclosure vulnerability that could potentially be exploited by malicious users to compromise an affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3871 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Optical | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A RADIUS Secret Disclosure vulnerability in the web network management interface of Cisco Prime Optical for Service Providers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to disclose sensitive information in the configuration generated for a device. The attacker must have valid credentials for the device. More Information: CSCvc65257. Known Affected Releases: 10.6(0.1). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3836 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Communications Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web framework Cisco Unified Communications Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data. More Information: CSCvb61689. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1.11007.2). Known Fixed Releases: 12.0(0.98000.162) 12.0(0.98000.178) 12.0(0.98000.383) 12.0(0.98000.488) 12.0(0.98000.536) 12.0(0.98000.6) 12.0(0.98500.6). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3805 | 1 Cisco | 1 Iox | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco IOS and Cisco IOx Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view confidential information that is displayed without authenticating to the device. Affected Products: This vulnerability affects Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOx Software running on IR829, IR809, IE4K, and CGR1K platforms. More Information: CSCvb20897. Known Affected Releases: 1.0(0). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3742 | 3 Google, Lenovo, Microsoft | 3 Android, Connect2, Windows | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Lenovo Connect2 versions earlier than 4.2.5.4885 for Windows and 4.2.5.3071 for Android, when an ad-hoc connection is made between two systems for the purpose of sharing files, the password for this ad-hoc connection will be stored in a user-readable location. An attacker with read access to the user's contents could connect to the Connect2 hotspot and see the contents of files while they are being transferred between the two systems. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3738 | 4 Debian, Nodejs, Openssl and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Node.js, Openssl and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3764 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Xclarity Administrator | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability was identified in Lenovo XClarity Administrator (LXCA) before 1.4.0 where LXCA user account names may be exposed to unauthenticated users with access to the LXCA web user interface. No password information of the user accounts is exposed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3736 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 5 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0g. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. This only affects processors that support the BMI1, BMI2 and ADX extensions like Intel Broadwell (5th generation) and later or AMD Ryzen. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3732 | 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat | 5 Node.js, Openssl, Jboss Core Services and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem. | ||||